CNN’s Controversial Choice: Russia Hoaxer Moderator For Trump/Biden Debate

CNN’s announcement that Jake Tapper will be one of the moderators for the upcoming debate between former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden has drawn criticism and skepticism, with many questioning the network’s impartiality in the selection process.

Tapper, known for his outspoken left-leaning views and involvement in contentious political issues, has been a prominent figure in the media landscape, particularly during the Trump administration. His role in perpetuating the Russia collusion hoax and his public clashes with Trump have raised concerns about his ability to moderate a fair and unbiased debate.

Critics argue that Tapper’s history of partisan commentary and his close association with Democrat narratives make him an unsuitable choice for such a crucial event. His past interactions with political figures, including leaked debate questions to Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016, have fueled doubts about his impartiality.

Tapper’s involvement in controversies and his vocal criticism of Trump have led many to question CNN’s motives in selecting him as a moderator. Some see it as a deliberate attempt to tilt the debate in Biden’s favor, given Tapper’s perceived alignment with Democrat interests.

While CNN has defended its decision, citing Tapper’s experience and credentials as a journalist, the network’s track record of biased coverage has only intensified scrutiny over the selection process. Critics argue that Tapper’s presence could undermine the integrity of the debate and further erode public trust in the media’s ability to remain impartial.

As the debate date approaches, the controversy surrounding Tapper’s appointment underscores broader concerns about media bias and the role of journalists in shaping political discourse. With the credibility of mainstream media outlets increasingly called into question, the choice of moderators for events like presidential debates takes on added significance, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in journalistic practices.